So recently, I heard of the making of the fourth Matrix movie, which I thought to myself is not necessary. I felt that the last Matrix didn't end with enough substance to keep going, and the characters were pretty much wrapped up. I liked the first Matrix movie; I think it was truly unique. In general, the things they could do in the first one were incredible, like the bullet-dodging scene. I can see how it redefined movies for this generation.
The story was pretty good, too, though I am getting sick of the chosen one idea. I don't think a character needs to save the world and be a destined hero. I prefer the Marvel style, where it takes a team of people to save the world, not just one. I know it's the classic hero's journey formula, but honestly, I think that in every movie, you shouldn't point out who the hero will be. For instance, if I wanted to turn Star Wars on its head, I would make Leah the hero instead of Luke. To me, that is a much more exciting and surprising storyline and takes away the predictability. But like I said, I think the first Matrix movie was fantastic and very well-made, even if the chosen scenario was predictable.
I honestly don't think the other two films were needed, but I understand it was a very marketable movie brand purpose, and lots of movies become trilogies. That said, I do think the next time a trilogy is made, the ending should either tie up all the loose ends and leave enough thread hanging that your reason to make another film. I think the third Matrix tied everything out quite well, and again, didn't have enough yarn to make a fourth Matrix movie, but they're going to do it anyway.
In short, I do not think every movie made needs a sequel. I guess some movies can be self-contained: the box character has presented the threat, they come up with a plan, and it's resolved then, i.e., The Joker. No need for a second movie. What are your impressions of The Matrix trilogy as it is currently? Are you looking forward to the fourth movie?